China asks if ‘happy ending’ services are illegal

Subscribe Now Choose a package that suits your preferences.
Start Free Account Get access to 7 premium stories every month for FREE!
Already a Subscriber? Current print subscriber? Activate your complimentary Digital account.

Are ‘happy endings’ illegal in China?

Are ‘happy endings’ illegal in China?

BEIJING (AP) — China’s law enforcers are having an unusually public debate about a delicate topic: Do paid sexual services known as “happy endings” at massage parlors count as crimes if they don’t involve actual sexual intercourse?

While prostitution is illegal in China, its boundaries are being discussed with rare candor by courts, police and state media — even the usually stodgy flagship newspaper of the Communist Party.

“Various places have different standards for whether masturbation services are a crime; judicial interpretation urgently needed,” read a headline of the People’s Daily newspaper, which usually spends its time lecturing party members about discipline or obscure ideological issues.

The debate centers on sexual services provided by employees of usually low-end massage parlors or hair salons, advertised to customers with colorful phrases such as “hitting the airplane” and “breast massage.”

While common in Beijing and many other Chinese cities, the services became part of a conspicuous national conversation only this week, following newspaper reports about a crackdown that fizzled in southern Guangdong province.

Police in the city of Foshan arrested hair salon staff for providing sexual services, only to have prostitution charges against them overturned by a local court.

Now courts, police, prosecutors, lawyers and academics are being quoted discussing oral sex and other types of sexual services facilitated by body parts excluding genitals.

The question is whether such services can be considered prostitution if there is no intercourse.

Technically, no — at least according to the highest court in Guangdong province, which says such services fall outside the legal definition of prostitution.

The court pressed the legislature to clear up the matter saying that although no law bars such services, they “significantly damage social order and have a certain degree of social harm.”

The high court in eastern Zhejiang reportedly concurs that if there is no intercourse, there’s no prostitution, but police in the capital Beijing, southern Guiyang and elsewhere disagree. The discrepancy in views is unusual in a society where police, prosecutors and courts are often seen as working in lock-step with one another.

The debate also highlights how much more open urban Chinese have become in their attitudes toward sex, as prosperity rises and government controls on personal freedoms ease. Attitudes remain more traditional in the countryside.

Sociologist and sex expert Li Yinhe said the debate showed the country has come a long way since two decades ago, when displays of public affection and even dancing with members of the opposite sex could be punished.

“The whole social atmosphere has changed. Even in the 1980s the crackdowns were very strong, very severe,” Li said. “… In the past, organizing prostitution used to be punishable by death.”

She took in the unexpected court verdict with mock horror, saying, “This is simply too subversive.”

———

Associated Press researcher Flora Ji contributed to this report.

———

Follow Gillian Wong on Twitter at twitter.com/gillianwong